AMY and Bowling for Columbine
Component 2; Section B Documentary film
30 min question – 20 marks. Might ask you to refer to filmmaker theories or impact of digital technology. Choice of two questions.
Asif Kapadia – Director
- “Something happened with Amy, i wanted to know how that happened right in front of our eyes. How can someone die like that in this day and age? And it wasnt a shock; i almost knew it was going to happen.”
- “Its a very complicated and tender movie. It tackles family, media, fame, addiction, and importantly captures the heart of what she was about and the true musical genius”
Product context
- British documentary, co produced by Film 4 with Universal Musical
- Low production value but commercial success- £20m
- Asif Kapadia is documentary auteur – Senna, Diego Maradona
- Distributed by indie companies – A24 & Altitude
Amy Winehouse’s relationship with the Media
Her addictions and struggles with bulimia were almost ridiculed by the media, they used her issues and personal problems as a way to gain money and using her as clickbait.
2007 INDEPENDENT news paper, compares her to pete doherty and how she has stolen the crown of being a messed up user as if it is a competition the public can watch or bet on. using her eating disorders as a story comparing her body from 2005 to 2007, saying she looks better before, sexualising her.
Searching up stories about Amy winehouse from 2006 onwards they are all negative titles, ‘Amy arrested’
stories about her doing things in her home, intruding her privacy
“‘Rehab’ made Amy a star.” That’s kind of a perversely ironic line, don’t you think? What that song is about — Amy’s very personal struggle with addiction and with drugs — is what the media latched onto, even more so than her music.“
Asip Kapadias Style
Kapidias films are defined by an innovative style called ‘true fiction’ where the documentary is constructed almost entirely from archive footage (in the case of Amy, most of the footage in archive) and the story is told without any guiding voiceover, an untraditional break with convention in the documentary format.
Kapadia rose to fame as the director of Senna- another study of a talented but tragic figure, the racing driver Ayrton Senna and recently Maradona.
As a spectator, Kapadia’s style works because it looks at famous people who the public may have grown up hearing about their troubled lives and to have a different and more intimate insight into these characters lives, and although the bias is not overbearing, there is an emotional side which would make viewers feel sad and a sense of realism, reminders that she was a real person and not just what the media made of her. Maradona having died recently gives the documentary on him more impact, a way to remember him not just for his troubled life but for his success and personal reasons too.
- this style of documentary works because it mirros the msanner in which we live our lives in the modern world – for many of us, social media has become an extension of what we know as reality, we use stories and live recordings such as facetime to connect to friends and family.
- these stories mirror the aesthetic of Amy because the footage in the documentary is also shot and composed on mobile devices, this style connects viewers to the film
- the content is compelling and although the story of addiction has been told before, its a story being told in a new virtual social media type of way.
- more engaging to contemporary audiences mirrors how we look at social media.
Techniques used by Kapadia
- Stock footage (news sources/interviews)
- unseen footage captured on video by people close to her – mobile phone footage
- still images allowing spectators to use their imagination on the feelings and lets them to think about the situation
- lack of authorial voiceover is also important in encouraging the spectator to be guided more by the juxtaposition of images and sound rather than a direct point of view
- the selection of voices to support images and footage are carefully chosen, interviewers are not seen speaking directly to camera – unless in Amy Winehouses case as part of stock footage
- montage effect of editing – piecing together a narrative based on a variety of materials
- the use of real footage to provide expositional informatiuon about settings in most cases, London, taking the form of an ariel swooping shot
- the use of captions is used in the form of lyrics from Amy Winehouse’s songs- incidental music used in particular sequences that correspond with the footage of her life and subject matter.
Michael Moore
- An American filmmaker, author and political activist, known for his documentary series addressing political issues
- started a radical newspaper, the flint voice, and was involved with other left wing magazines
- very visible presence in documentaries, can be described as participatory and performative
- highly committed work, taking up a clear point of view which is left wing and ‘agit-pop’ documentary style- a political propaganda for left
- he justifies his practise in providing balance for mainstream media in his view that provides false information
- part of Moore’s approach is to use humour and lampoon the subject of his work and sometimes to recognise that documentaries need to entertain and hold an audience
Career and Style
- Use of comedy and dark satire used to attack the institutions that he targeted. Central to the films in seeing him interviewing people and his everyman persona encourages a range of responses
- underscored by physical appearance, he wears casual clothes, a baseball cap and is overweight. This laidback persona hides a sharp and incisive line of questioning which he uses to good affect
- work can be seen as subjective, the way comedy is employed whether by using clever expositional devices or by moores interviews themselves
- focus on a particular genre, e.g, guns control, invasion of Iraq, american health care system.
- a voice for the American left wing, some of his films have been successes in global box offices
film form in Bowling for Columbine
- the use of archive and found footage
- close ups and midshots of people talking
- action reaction shots for conversations
- editing used to orchestrate a certain message and response for the audience. the intention is to make fun of gun lovers and supporters
- questions used to orchestrate a certain message and responses from and to the audience. intentiion to make fun of gun lovers and supporters
- the director is on screen, in terms of his performance, he handles guns which are the topic of the documentary
PART 2 (01/12/20)
Michael Moore and Amy similarities
- filmmakers use film form to manipulate how the spectator feels and thinks – e.g voiceover, lens flare, archive footage specifically chosen. Also known as guided viewing experience. Example – long shot of Amy in a revealing outfit whilst the voiceover talks about her provocative behaviour. Links to Moore’s style through the way they both tug on heart strings.
Kim Longinotto
- Makes films that highlight female oppression, particularly the victims and women who have suffered.
- British documentary maker, had a hard upbringing and ended up going to Essex University and the National film school
- Observational filmmaker – uses techniques such as advanced planning, scripting, staging, narration, lighting, reenactment and interviewing.
- giving people control over their own stories, she observes and documents their lives.
- she favours long takes and tries to capture the extraordinary in the lives of the subjects that she observes
- uniquely personal stories, focusing on outsiders
- shot calmly and unobtrusively, being sensitive due to the victims being the focus. often a strong female victim
- worked in a number of different countries around the world, iran, italy, cameroon, japan, and the US.
- It could be argued that her perspective on the range of different cultures she encounters in her films gives a real sense of herself as an outsider filmmaker
Shooting the Mafia
- archive footage from the past relating to the mafia and people in the documentary now
- emotional music and pictures encouraging an emotional response from spectators
- interviews of the people involved
How can we compare Kim Longinotto’s style and the film Amy?
- All about the subject, directors arent mentioned or present
- Both look at social issues
- Longinotto uses subjects you are able to identify with – sympathetic and arguably ‘victim’ characters like Amy Winehouse
- Longinotto films highlight female victims of oppression, female central protagonists- Amy is similar to this
- No traditional narrative voiceover reinforces fictional film tradition
Conventional Documentary genres
- Hand held camera realism and truth
- Narrative voiceover preferred reading (the reading the filmmaker wants you to take) – Hall
- Intercutting with archive footage – non-linear. Investigate narrative building a picture. Vox pops (voice of the people) and interviews, use of conflict
- POV mediation, and subjectivity- exploration of themes and issues
- Informing, educating and entertaining the audience – voyuerism
AMY – Several narrative levels – innovative approach requiring a montage-like editing approach
- stock archive footage
- unseen footage released by friends and family
- use of still image (juxtaposition important with a lack of traditional narrative voiceover)
- captioned present day indirect interviews
- footage of aerial shots (London location) significant to the characters story
Narrative
- Based on archive footage and 100 edited interviews
- linear with flashback as narrative journey- use of home footage – teenage wannabe to pop star to drug taker to music icon
- spectator interaction with Amy- positioned using emotive representations e.g Mitch (her father) and his 7yr affair, walking out on mother when Amy was 9 years old
- no narrative voice over (challenging documentary convention) use of captions position the spectator
- use of still images with stock new footage, unseen and interviews create a montage effect
Critical Debates
objectivity – no personal views or emotional emphasis
non fiction – truth regarding information, an event or person
construction – falsely created
truth – something presented accuratelty to the way
reality
cinematic
from most to least important in documentary films:
truth, reality, cinematic, non fiction objectivity construction
Bill Nichols
A leading American film academic who wrote a seminal text on documentary form, introduction to documentary (indiana university press)
Six modes of Documentary
- Nichols identified what he termed as six modes of documentary. These were distinct cinematic modes which utilise a range of different filmic techniques. These modes help define the shape and feel of a documentary film.
- Poetic – arranges footage in an order to evoke response through tone, rhythm or juxtapostion. Use associative editing to create a mood or tone avoiding explicit argument about a subject
- Expository – has a specific argument or viewpoint, speaks directly to the viewer with a voiceover and leads you through the film with rhetorical questions. Often television documentary
- Reflexive – calls attention to the conventions of documentary filmmaking in terms of direct acknowledgement of the filmmaking process. Film with self awareness, film about making a film showing a film being made with cameras, mics. Man with a movie camera.
- Observational the camera looks on as the participants in the film go on with their lives, as if the camera isnt present. Filmmaker steps back from material and doesnt have much of a presence, a neutral stance. Uninterrupted handheld e.g direct cinema/ cinema verite
- Performative – emphasizes the expressive quality of the filmmakers engagement with the subject of the film and addresses the audience in a vivid way. This is where the filmmaker is not aloof from subject matter but who actively engages with the material, where they are seen as a participant.
- Participatory – the filmmaker interacts with the participants in the film, relationship between filmmaker and person being filmed becomes more direct and complex. They directly participate in shaping what happens on camera, often through interviews.
https://nofilmschool.com/2015/09/nichols-6-modes-documentary-can-help-expand-your-storytelling
What applies to Amy?
- Observational
- Poetic
- Reflexive
Asif Kapadia on Preferred readings
- grew up around Camden, links to London and knew her music well. ‘Just someone up the road’
- Wasnt shocked when she died, wanted to find out why it ended and why no one stopped it happening. Unravelling who she was, what inspired her, how did she get into drugs and what happened. Going back from the ending to figure it out.
- had enough questions to answer to make the film.
- He stood out to her, vintage clothing yet an ordinary girl in London who struggled from a young age
- Saw her as taking her bad situations into positive things through writing songs,she was under control with her negative thoughts til she got more famous and it became out of her control.
- Thinks Blake is to blame for the drugs and the fact no one thought she needed help.
- Kapadia shows how the songs she wrote related to her time, and how personal and how obvious it was that she was struggling. Her songs tell a story about herself.
- He didnt know the story well before making the documentary, not going in with a agenda, filmmaking more subjective and observational.
- Nick had a key influence on the filmmaking and helped them to research, he spoke about his experience and said to speak to more people, like a snowball effect. All the people in Amy’s life had a contribution
- structure of her story in chapters
- everything that happened and everything that she dealt with played a part in her downfall
- Film is about Amy and what was best for her, not about anyone else; ‘some people found it difficult that it was just about her’ reference to Mitch who tried to have control and how he negatively contributed to her life. He tried to sell his life story through Amy.
- every song is like a chapter of her life, as if she knew from a young age what would happen to her and we didnt pay enough attention.
- believes it could have been stopped but people used her for money, as well as journalists and media and the audiences who contributed to her demise
- reflective – make it feel cinematic and as if youre in there. the footage is of Amy singing and talking into a camera, Blake with a camera, paparazzi with a camera. the camera goes from being her friend to an enemy, negative gaze of the camera. ]
- Amy wasnt interested in fame and money, she had her door open to everyone.
- music comes from tension and drama, her songs are so good because she felt emotions and was dark
Critical Debate: Digital technology
- the degree of the impact that digital has had on film since the 1990s is a developing debate. Some film commentators argue that although digital technology could potentially transform cinema, so far films, especially narrative films designed for cinema release have changed very little from pre-digital times. Others consider that the impact of digital filmmaking is only beginning to emerge, both in high concept hollywood filmmaking and in much lower budget experimental work
- Amy is a film which uses digital technology to tell its story.
Are smart phones valid for shooting important footage?
IN FAVOUR
- We are all now potential filmmakers which gives us access to the medium
- This may have been denied in the past because of cost or lack of technical ability
- This type of filmmaking can capture our reality
- We can document parts of our lives especially key events
- These films can reflect how we were feeling at a particular time
- There is the potential to use the internet as a means of distrubution
- Equally aesthetic decisions can be made on how the films look and how they are subsequently recieved
AGAINST
- Whatever happened to the use of our memories- shouldnt this be enough to document our own reality
- Does the filming of what we determine as our key events be possibly seen as self obsessed and narcisstic
- What viewpoint of reality is this point of view actually giving
- Can this sort of filming ever be truly objective
- Who is going to want to see what we have filmed
- Without technical manipulation (such as editing) can these films ever create a coherent narrative
- Is digital technology too easily disposable to last? What is the ultimate value artistically
Film Vs Digital
Does this really matter to audiences?
If it does what have they gained or lost as a result of this revolution in film industry?
film more organic, dominant medium, makes a film feel more unique
digital crisp, sharp, artificial, is cheaper by a lot , more widely available
Amy and Digital Technology
- Documentary has always responded to the possibilities afforded by new technologies. the growth over the years of more portable cameras and sound equipment have added to the way that documentaries can show real innovation when reporting on their subject matter
- In Kapadias film there is very little original footage shot, only consisting of establishing shots of London from birdseye view with a drone or helicopter. These are done digitally, offering a counterpoint to the rest of the film which is archive footage
- Amy is the work of a number of filmmakers and kapadias skill as a filmmaker is really seen in the editing room. Got archive footage from media sources and friends and family Amy, placing the two together.
- The combination of analouge and early digital recordings of Amy from her friends and family do offer a revealing perspective on her childhood and early life and the start of her career
- Interesting debates developed on the more controversial aspects of her life- bulimia, addictions, relationships.
- We only hear interviews and never see them, Kapadia would have spoken to these people and recorded their thoughts and use them to play with videos and images
- The manipulation and montage effect of using the footage alongside interviews give the film power and emotion
Meaning and responses/ Critical debates
- Documentary subjectivity – negative, mediated representation of Mitch (gave permission but objected the film)
- Kapadia denies agenda, “there is nothing there that isnt in her lyrics”
- Other criticism – spectator voyeurism (‘another icon who died young’ – fascination with troubled celebritism
- Interviews suggest early patriarchal control by Mitch- Amy seeking approval from him (Rehab lyrics)
- Selection of interviews and narrative construction crucial to production of meaning e.g Mitch turning up in Jamaica with a film crew.
- Encourages you to have an opinion